My car now has $3000+ damage and the other driver, while at fault, also had major damage. Does anyone else think the Southern Shores police setup this accident scenario ? Does anyone have an idea how the police could have achieve their objectives in a more productive manner ?
Next time, hold your ground and fight any tickets in court. The law clearly uses the word "within" in reference to where a pedestrian must be located in reference to a crosswalk. That is not... standing beside, appearing to want to cross, twiddling their thumbs on the side of the road, etc. If they are not within and you are not going to strike them... carry on. Obviously exceptions present themselves like children on bikes/scooters, playing with toys, etc. near the road and you're not sure what they will do, but edge cases aside... don't be "that guy" and stop in the road for no reason. That's my $0.02.
Click to follow link...If the cops setup a sting and placed someone within the crosswalk and you stopped as legally required and you were rear ended then that's an issue for the guy behind you. It would have happened even if it wasn't a cop. If you stopped for someone not standing WITHIN the crosswalk then that's on you, IMO.
I do think the sting operation is BS though, but not sure what you can really say about it. Either you or the driver behind you was in the wrong. Someone made a mistake in that scenario. Read the law, abide by it, and go from there.
Like +2QuoteFlag